Today I regret

My friend was swearing by Allah, as he wanted me to believe that Love had him in its grip and that he was powerless to resist.

While I was abusing him and telling him not to swear by Allah for his HARAM Love. 

But he kept on swearing, while I threatened him that either his love would end, or our friendship would end.

And his LOVER was himself unaware of my friend's love. He perhaps didn't even know about the existence of my friend. It was completely a one-sided love. 

Still my friend was thinking only about him. 

And then he made the further mistake of trusting a religious person like me to be his friend and told me about his love

Alas, why was I unable to feel his loneliness? And I made him even lonelier.

Now I feel as if I killed him alive. He didn't tell anyone else after me.

I saw him falling ill in love. I saw him being admitted to the hospital.

Still, I felt no sympathy for him. I didn't even visit him.

Perhaps, pity did stir inside, but my religious devoutness took hold of me. And my humanity, it did hide. 

When doctors didn't understand the illness, they recommended sending him to another place for a change.

His family first sent him to another city to the relatives. After some time, I heard he went to Canada.

But I am standing here today along with my regrets.

But perhaps not.

Today when I don't feel disgusted any more when I see these loving birds, and when best wishes automatically come out of my heart for them,

then I feel as if my regrets are perhaps being washed away, 

But tears still come to my eyes

I perhaps unburdened my heart from regrets, but I didn't unburden the heart of my friend when he needed me the most.

 

***

Lesson:

When I left Islam and became an atheist, I still felt a strong dislike for homosexuality. This feeling came from the way religion had taught me, with stories that compared homosexuality to terrible things, like having sex with close family members.

Even after reading a lot and learning that homosexuality is not a choice, my feelings didn’t change right away. It took me years to fully get rid of this dislike, which I now understand was caused by religious teachings from my childhood.

Many ex-Muslims face similar struggles. For example, they may find it hard to eat pork or non-Halal chicken, even though they no longer believe in the rules that make these foods forbidden. This is similar to how some atheists in Western countries might feel uncomfortable eating snakes or insects because their culture taught them it’s disgusting.

The important lesson I learned is this: we should not let religious people brainwash children for the sake of humanity. It creates feelings and beliefs that can take years to undo, even when a person no longer believes in the religion.


 

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →