Zakir Naik offers two bizarre explanations for why people become homosexual:

  1. Homosexuality begins when the rule of Hijab is broken. According to him, if Hijab is observed, homosexuality will never occur.

  2. If a man sleeps with 20, 30, 40, or more women, he eventually gets tired and turns homosexual.

You can watch his video here:

Our Response:

Zakir Naik is completely wrong on both counts.

First of all:

  • It were Sahaba (including Muhammad) and Muslim Jihadists who used to sleep with 10, 20, 30 or more women (wives, captive and slave women). 

  • And Muhammad himself broke the rule of Hijab when he prohibited slave women to take the Hijab. Islam even kept their breasts naked in public. Yes, there were thousands of slave women present in front of Muhammad and Sahaba and Muslims of the last 14 centuries, with naked breasts in public. 

  • And Umar ibn Khattab used to beat slave women for taking HIjab and told them not to resemble free Muslim women by taking Hijab. For details, please read this article:  Hijab has nothing to do with modesty, as Islam prohibited Slave Women from taking Hijab or even covering their naked breasts in public

Secondly:

You will most probably become an old man till you are finished having sex with 40 or 50 women. 

Moreover, scientific research has clearly shown that homosexuality is not caused by sexual exhaustion or too much intercourse with women. Most homosexuals experience same-sex attraction from a young age, often during early childhood. Gender identity and sexual orientation have biological and psychological roots, not sexual fatigue.

In Conclusion:

  • If breaking the Hijab rule were truly the cause of homosexuality, then Islamic societies, where countless slave women were present in public without the Hijab and with naked breasts, should have been filled with homosexuals. 

  • Furthermore, homosexual behavior is reported in many Islamic seminaries (madrassas), where women are either entirely absent or fully covered. This also disproves Zakir Naik’s claim.

  • Scientific studies continue to confirm that homosexuality is not caused by sleeping with many women. Sadly, Zakir Naik chooses to spread misinformation and hatred against homosexuals instead of addressing facts. His arguments are not only misleading but also deeply harmful.

 


Please don't forget:

Not only did Islam permit men to sexually exploit their female slaves, it went even further. It allowed these women to be passed around, shared among brothers, guests, and even other slaves, with no concern for their will, consent, or dignity.

  • First, Islam allowed the master to sexually exploit the slave girl against her will.
  • Then, after satisfying his desires, the master was permitted to hand her over to any of his brothers or slaves, again without her consent.
  • One by one, his brothers and slaves could sexually exploit her in temporary relationships similar to Mut’ah in Shia Islam.
  • When they were finished, she was sold again in the Islamic slave market while the first master replaced her with another slave girl to be sexually exploited anew.
  • The second master sexually exploited her and then sold her to a third. This merciless cycle of abuse continued, trapping the poor girl in endless exploitation with no escape.

This is not a story from some distant past, but is recorded in the most authentic Islamic texts: Sahih Muslim, Sahih Bukhari, and others.

Sahih Muslim, Kitab-ul-Nikah (link), Sahih Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Qadr (link), Sahih Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Tauheed (link):

0 Abu Sa'id al-Khadri said: We went out with Allah's Messenger on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired (to have sex with) them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but we also desired good ransom money by selling them). So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (i.e. withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception so that they don’t become pregnant and could be sold for good ransom money). But then we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger, and he said: (Yes, it is allowed, but) it does not matter if you do it or not, while if any soul has to be born up to the Day of Resurrection, then it will be born.

Furthermore, Islam also allowed the master, if he got lust for the wife of his male slave, then he could snatch away the wife from his male slave and sexually exploit her, thus destroying the whole slave family. 

Sahih Bukhari, [Chapter: "Forbidden to you (for marriage) are: your mothers, your daughters..."]:
وَقَالَ أَنَسٌ: {وَالْمُحْصَنَاتُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ} ذَوَاتُ الأَزْوَاجِ الْحَرَائِرُ حَرَامٌ إِلاَّ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ لاَ يَرَى بَأْسًا أَنْ يَنْزِعَ الرَّجُلُ جَارِيَتَهُ مِنْ عَبْدِهِ.
Anas said: The meaning of the Quranic verse: {وَالْمُحْصَنَاتُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ} Married free women are forbidden to you except your married slave women that your right hands possess. But there is no problem if a man (i.e. the owner) takes his (married) female slave (for himself) from his male slave.

The evil of "Temporary" sexual relationships with slave girls in Islam also led to another evil, where the swapping of slave girls also became Halal Allah. If a Muslim man got lust for a slave girl of another person, he can simply offer that other man to swap their slave girls to sexually exploit her without her consent. 

Tafsir-e-Mazhari is a commentary of the Quran, which is taught in every Hanafi school. It is written under the commentary of verse 33:52 (Link):

Ibn Zayd said about this verse {وَلَآ أَن تَبَدَّلَ بِهِنَّ مِنْ أَزْوَٰجٍ nor to exchange your present wives for other women (Verse 33:52)} that people used to swap their wives during the era of ignorance ... upon that Allah revealed this verse and the swapping of wives is thus not allowed. But the slave women are not included in it, and you can swapp them and there is no issue in it. 

For more proofs, please read this article: Part 1: Crimes of Islamic Slavery against Humanity

Moreover:

  • Muhammad had 11 to 13 wives. 
  • He also had multiple slave women.
  • Muhammad always got huge spoils of war due to Khums. Alone in one battle of Khaibar, he got 7 slave women, whom he traded for a single beautiful Safiyyah (Sahih Muslim 1365e)

 

Zakir Naik: If you sleep with 10, 20 women, you become tired and you become homosexual

 

 

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →